People v. Lovejoy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
On his appeal, defendant challenges the denial of his suppression motion, contending that the cocaine seized in December should have been suppressed because the police lacked probable cause to arrest him. We disagree. “Probable cause exists when an officer has knowledge of facts and circumstances ‘sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been or is being committed’ ” (People v Maldonado, 86 NY2d 631, 635 [1995], quoting People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423 [1985]; see People v Parker, 84 AD3d 1508, 1509 [2011]). Here, police officers were performing surveillance on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. MaldonadoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013