Legal Opinion

People v. Roper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Sections 93 and 94 of the General Construction Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 22) have no application here. They provide merely a principle of construction to be applied in determining the scope of legislation which expressly or impliedly repeals earlier statutes. In the absence of evidence of contrary intent such legislation is not to be given retroactive effect. (People ex rel. City of Buffalo v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 156 N. Y. 570.) They apply with special force to statutes which otherwise would be ex post facto or would deprive persons of substantial rights. Here the Legislature has reduced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. People Ex Rel. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  3. Kelly v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Kellogg v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. EnnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API