Talcott v. Hurlbert
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. M. H. Hyland, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage on certain personal property described in the complaint. Judgment was entered against plaintiff and defendants Hurlbert, Woolfolk, and Rey, and in favor of intervener, Hansbrow. Defendants have not appealed. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from the judgment in favor of intervener, and the contest is here between plaintiff and respondent Hansbrow.
The findings show the following to be the material facts: On the eighteenth day of July, 1893, E. C. Hurlbert and C. A. Woolfolk made and delivered their promissory note to one Hall for five…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank v. MenkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Farmers' Exchange Bank v. PurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kausler v. FordMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. AshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- In Re PeartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Bell v. SageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Eichler v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- In re Ramblier Cafeteria, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.