Legal Opinion

Levy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1919No. 5245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with being a vagrant, in that she was a common prostitute, and also with running a house of prostitution. There were two other counts in the complaint,, but as they were abandoned, are not discussed. She was convicted either with being a common prostitute or running, a house of prostitution, or both. The court enters up his judgment to the effect that she was found guilty of being a common prostitute and running a house of prostitution, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $200, and this he recites in. his judgment constituted her a vagrant.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Forbish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Titus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Youngblood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API