Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion to resubmit his whistleblower claim pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75-b. The petitioner’s Civil Service Law § 75-b claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, as the claim was litigated in a prior CPLR article 78 proceeding commenced by the court-appointed guardian of the petitioner’s property. That proceeding was resolved by a so-ordered stipulation in which the guardian agreed to discontinue the proceeding with prejudice. Pursuant to the stipulation, the petitioner’s resignation from the police department was annulled, and he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert v. O'MearaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. James M. v. City of New York Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Barash v. Northern Trust Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Murphy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API