Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Summers v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2006No. 45683Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rose C. J.,

with whom Maupin and Douglas, JJ., agree, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

Although I agree with the majority that Summers is not entitled to relief, I dissent in regard to the majority’s conclusion that the Confrontation Clause and Crawford v. Washington1 do not apply to capital penalty hearings. The majority opinion relies on a fifty-seven-year-old United States Supreme Court case that was decided well before any of the .United States Supreme Court’s more recent death penalty pronouncements. The United States Supreme Court *1336has not addressed this precise issue but has…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API