Summers v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Rose C. J.,
with whom Maupin and Douglas, JJ., agree, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
Although I agree with the majority that Summers is not entitled to relief, I dissent in regard to the majority’s conclusion that the Confrontation Clause and Crawford v. Washington1 do not apply to capital penalty hearings. The majority opinion relies on a fifty-seven-year-old United States Supreme Court case that was decided well before any of the .United States Supreme Court’s more recent death penalty pronouncements. The United States Supreme Court *1336has not addressed this precise issue but has…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.