Legal Opinion

Amos-Richia v. Northwestern Mutual Life-Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906No. Docket No. 94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Lavern Amos-Richia against the Northwestern Mutual Life-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

For a general statement of this case we refer to Northwestern Mut. Life-Ins. Co. v. Amos, 136 Mich. 210. We there held that a suit in equity would not lie, as the complainant had. a complete and adequate remedy at law. After that decision the defendant there and the plaintiff here remarried, and brought this suit on the $3,000 policy, which resulted in a verdict and judg*685ment for her. Any further statement of facts essential will be made in connection with the points raised.

The first question arises upon the delivery of the policy. Plaintiff’s claim is based entirely upon the production of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clemens v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Sammons v. HallowayMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life-Insurance v. AmosMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. WirthleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Strong v. Hercules Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Sullivan v. HelliMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API