Legal Opinion
(PC) Murphy v. Flores
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 6, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00740Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONRELL DONOVAN MURPHY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00740-NODJ-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 13 v. REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 14 FLORES, (ECF No. 20) 15 Defendant. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 I. Background 18 Plaintiff Monrell Donovan Murphy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 19 in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action 20 was initiated on May 12, 2023. (ECF No. 1.)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Eric Knapp v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.