Legal Opinion

Moore v. Clark

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1885Published

On pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Bird, Y. C.

This bill is filed to foreclose a mortgage. The defence is payment, or rather the statute of limitations is set up as a bar. The mortgage was executed more than twenty years before suit brought. The answer to this defence is that the defendant, the *153present owner, took title before the expiration of the twenty years, and when he took the title he accepted a deed in which it was expressly stated that it was conveyed subject to this mortgage. I conclude that that was such an acknowledgment as will take the case out of the statute. Jackson v. Wood, 12 Johns. 242; Park v. Peck, 1 Paige…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heyer v. PruynNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  2. Jackson ex dem. People v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  3. Jackson ex dem. Mackay v. SlaterNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Park v. PeckNew York Court of Chancery · 1829

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API