Rogers v. Harrison

Reeves, Associate Justice.

The judgment in this case is entitled “ J. E. Harrison, Adm’r, v. Wm. H. Hart et al.”

It' is recited in the judgment that the “defendant,” without giving his name, made default, or if more defendants than one were intended to be embraced in the judgment, as may be inferred from the style of the case, it is not stated who they were. If the names of the parties against whom the judgment was rendered could be ascertained with clearness and certainty from any other part of the record, and there was no other reason than a defect in the form of the entry why it should not…