Legal Opinion

Life Path Partners, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2018No. 2015–0759PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWine, J.

*238{¶ 1} Ordinarily, pursuant to R.C. 5715.19(A), a taxpayer protesting the valuation of a property must file a complaint by March 31 of the year succeeding the tax year in question-e.g., a taxpayer disputing a valuation for tax year 2012 would have to file a complaint by March 31, 2013. But R.C. 5715.19(D) provides an exception to that requirement-if a taxpayer already has a complaint in the pipeline regarding that particular parcel and the county board of revision does not determine that complaint within 90 days, the taxpayer does not need to file complaints in succeeding years regarding that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. AERC Saw Mill Village, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. 1495 Jaeger L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Corex Partners, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. MDM Holdings, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Novita Industries, L.L.C. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Northridge Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Colonial, Inc. v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API