Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. . Burton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oubiam.

It is conceded that the affidavit on which the warrant of attachment was issued is insufficient, for that the grounds for plaintiff’s assertion therein that defendant was about to dispose of her property and that she was about to leave the State, with intent to defraud her creditors, are not set out in the affidavit. C. S., 799. In First National Bank v. Tarboro Cotton Factory, 179 N. C., 203, 102 S. E., 195, it is said that the mere assertion of a belief that a defendant is about to assign or dispose of his property with intent to defraud his 'creditors is insufficient; the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. . KivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Clark v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  3. First National Bank v. Tarboro Cotton FactorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Cook v. New York Corundum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rushing v. . AshcraftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API