Legal Opinion
Wiesenberger v. Mayers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Vooehis, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing the complaint in an action for brokerage commissions claimed to be payable for procuring a purchaser of corporate stock. Plaintiff’s terms of employment were expressed in the form of a letter addressed to defendants Lawrence and Chauncey Mayers, which they approved in writing, and which reads as follows:
“ This will serve as the memorandum which you requested of what we previously agreed upon orally regarding the sale of all of the outstanding stock of L. & C. Mayers Co., Inc., which I understand is owned by your wives and yourselves.
“ As I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Stern v. Gepo Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Kampf v. DreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Kronenberger v. BierlingAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902
- Pease & Elliman, Inc. v. HoptAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oil Trading Associates, Inc. v. Texas City Refining, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Broadstone Realty Corp. v. EvansDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Poritzky v. GraffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- Hecht v. MellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Mills v. 630 Park AssociatesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.