Legal Opinion
Xcel Energy, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 19, 2006No. Civ. No. 04-1449 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ERICKSON, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Motion of the Plaintiff Xcel Energy Inc. (“Xcel”) to compel the Government to produce an amended privilege log, and/or to produce documents not properly protected by the deliberative process privilege, and to require more complete responses to Xcel’s Third Request for Admissions. A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on July 7, 2006, at which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edeh v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Texture Source, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Desert Valley Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- NCMIC Ins. Co. v. Allied Professional Ins. Co. et al.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2026