Medical Facilities Development, Inc. v. Little Arch Creek Properties, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurrence
BARKDULL, Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur with Judge Levy’s opinion and write only to point out the following:
Section 48.23(3), Fla.Stat. (1993), authorizes a trial court to treat a lis pendens, such as the one in this case, the same as a temporary injunction. A temporary injunction is only issued when a plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law, i.e. ascertainable damages, or in other words, irreparable damage or injury.
The dissent, and the authority cited therein, seems to miss the point as to who must suffer irreparable damages. A showing of irreparable damage is essential for a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Mohican Valley, Inc. v. MacDonaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Shea v. Central Diagnostic Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- LONGSHORE LAKES JT. VENTURE v. MundyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Roger Dean Chevrolet, Inc. v. Painters, Etc., Local No. 452District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.