Legal Opinion

Bowers v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1968No. 45,174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

The plaintiffs bring this action seeking to enjoin the defendants, the City of Kansas City, Kansas and the Urban Renewal Agency of Kansas City, Kansas from taking their property through the medium of eminent domain proceedings undertaken in connection with the University-Rosedale Urban Renewal Project.

The action was tried to the court, which made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed from that judgment. We shall refer to the appellants either as plaintiffs or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brick v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Moyer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Arkenberg v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Collins v. MerrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. City of Winfield v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Locklear v. HultineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  5. Sullivan v. City of UlyssesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API