Legal Opinion
Stolow v. Hearst Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the alleged first defense and the alleged first partial defense as being insufficient in law. The action is brought to recover $150,000 damages by reason of an article published by the defendant in its newspaper the Daily Mirror, on March 31,1950. The plaintiff alleges one cause of action for libel and another cause of action under the Civil Rights Law. No useful purpose is served by recounting in detail the contents of the published article, a copy of which has been attached to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Campbell v. New York Evening Post, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Sanford v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Lee v. Brooklyn Union Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Lundin v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wenz v. BeckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996