Legal Opinion

Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine Dissent Corrected

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2001No. 89492 RelPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

The issue in this case is. whether the Federal Boat Safety Act of 1971 (FBSA) (46 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (1994)) preempts state common law causes of action based on the manufacturer’s failure to install propeller guards on boat engines. In July 1995, while boating in Tennessee, plaintiff’s decedent, Jeanne Sprietsma, fell from a motorboat and was struck by the motor’s propeller blades. As a result, she suffered serious injuries that resulted in her death. The boat was equipped with a 115-horsepower outboard motor, which did not contain a propeller guard. The motor was designed, manufactured,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API