Legal Opinion
Therrell v. Arthur
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 13, 1932No. 1137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RITTER, District Judge.
The grounds for remanding this cause are urged only by the alleged defendant, which, for convenience, I call the Arthur committee. The plaintiff and the defendant Edmunds committee' are not questioning the removal. The real ground for asking the removal is that the defendants are not all nonresidents of the state of Florida, so as to give diversity of citizenship. The members of the so-called Arthur committee are residents of Florida. This committee asserts that it is representing bondholders of various trusts involved by reason of an agreement dated December 11,1931,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Bissell v. FossSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Interstate Refineries, Inc. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- State of Florida v. ANDERSONSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Helms v. EheDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968