Wiersgalla v. Garrett
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs Terry and Cindy Wiersgalla, who instituted this personal injury action against defendants Warren Garrett and Iowa Electric Light and Power Company, appeal from a post-trial ruling of the district court, claiming they are entitled to a new trial. Our court of appeals agreed with plaintiffs’ contentions, and reversed and remanded for a new trial on all issues raised. Although we agree that plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial, we believe defendant Iowa Electric Light and Power Company should be exempted from relit-igating a second action.
Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Koll v. Manatt's Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Brichacek v. HiskeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Ford v. MitchamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Carlson v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Leaf v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Kathryn Winger and Timothy Potts v. Cm Holdings, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Veridian Credit Union v. Eddie Bauer, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Walker v. MlakarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.