Vest v. Vest

The case before us challenges the Court of Civil Appeals’ April 2014 decision affirming, without an opinion, the trial, court’s order holding Jennifer Ann Vest (Herron) (“Vest”) in contempt.1 I believe that the contempt order is the only decision before us and the only decision that should be addressed. However, this Court asked the parties to file briefs on a different issue2 — one that was settled in a 2013 Court of Civil Appeals’ decision3 on which we have previously denied certiorari re*1058view.4 Vest answered our request; David Jeremy Vest filed a letter stating that he could not afford to…