Legal Opinion

Otis Williams & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 9, 1951No. 48814PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakeR, Judge

Plaintiffs sue for damages for delay in the furnishing of reinforcement steel by the defendant under a contract entered into between the parties on April 15,1946.

On April 10, 1945, the defendant, through the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the Interior, issued invitations for bids for construction of the Big Flat Canal. Plaintiffs were the low bidder, and on April 15, 1946, about a year later, were awarded the contract.

*271The specifications, which were attached to the invitation for bids, provided in paragraph 11:

Availability of fwnds. — This contract is made contingent upon Congress making…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  4. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Commerce International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API