Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1988No. 86-1424PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

Pursuant to D.C. Code § 23-104(a)(l) (1981) the United States appeals from the grant of a motion to suppress physical evidence and statements. It contends that since an anonymous tip justified an investigative stop under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), the police had a right to search containers which might hold weapons, and that the statements were not obtained during custodial interrogation in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We agree that the physical evidence should not have been…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Gomez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Speight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Joseph v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Cauthen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API