Narregang v. Narregang
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Frank McNulty, Judge. Action ¡by Helen Caystile Narregang against Spencer W. Narregang, for divorce and alimony. From an order denying defendant’s petition to' be relieved from payment of part of the unpaid portion of the alimony, he appeals. Under section 92, Civ.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Frank McNulty, Judge. Action ¡by Helen Caystile Narregang against Spencer W. Narregang, for divorce and alimony. From an order denying defendant’s petition to' be relieved from payment of part of the unpaid portion of the alimony, he appeals. Under section 92, Civ. Code, this court seems to have held uniformly that it was intended thereby that all judgments for alimony were subject to such revision from time to time as the changed condition of the parties might require. These matters may be presented to the court on motion or application, as was…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
This is a divorce action, and it was tried and decree entered therein in the year 1909. The said decree was in favor of the plaintiff, and, among other things, granted to her alimony in a gross or lump sum. The original decree made no provision for the payment of this alimony in installments, gnd it all became due at once; but, on stipulation of the parties thereafter entered into, the court granted an extension of time for the payment of part of the amount due, and, through certain other orders, the time of payment of a’ part of said alimony was further extended, so that in January, 1912, a…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. FarkasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Shoop v. ShoopSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Warne v. WarneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Eggers v. EggersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Moore v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.