Legal Opinion

68V BTR Holdings, LLC v. City of Fairhope

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided September 5, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00430Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION 68V BTR HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION 22-0430-WS-B ) CITY OF FAIRHOPE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for entitlement to attorney’s fees and related nontaxable expenses. (Doc. 154). The plaintiff has filed a response and the defendants a reply, (Docs. 160, 163), and the motion is ripe for resolution. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API