Legal Opinion

Sothern v. United States

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTrieber, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). „ The only question to be determined on the demurrer is whether a marriage contracted by a lunatic or insane person is wholly void, so that it may be attacked collaterally, or only voidable, and valid until set aside in a direct proceeding instituted for that purpose.

Marriage is now recognized by all the American as well as the English courts as a civil contract. Meister v. Moore, 96 U. S. 76, 78, 24 L. Ed. 826; Reynolds v. United States, 98 U. S. 145, 165, 25 L. Ed. 244 ; 38 C. J. 1272; 18 R. C. L. 383, and authorities there cited. Being a civil contract,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Dexter v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Hovey v. HobsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
  5. Brewster v. WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osoinach v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Kevan v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1933
  3. Christian v. Waialua Agr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API