Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Heckler

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 26, 1985No. CIV 83-0754 TUC ACMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARQUEZ, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for an order in the nature of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

The plaintiff apparently was injured on September 3, 1981 in an automobile accident. On June 3, 1982 she submitted applications for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits. The Administrative Law Judge (AU) found plaintiff not to be disabled and denied benefits. On September 15, 1983 the Appeals Council approved the denial of benefits: This action was then commenced.

On June 15, 1984 the magistrate recommended that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Queenan v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kevin Weeks v. Social Security Administration CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Kilpatrick v. BowenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API