Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Thompson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1996No. 63541-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

922 P.2d 1343 (1996)

130 Wash.2d 368

Davis RICHMOND, Respondent,

v.

Woodrow THOMPSON and Jane Doe Thompson, whose true Christian name is unknown, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners.

No. 63541-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 15, 1996.

Decided September 26, 1996.

William R. Bishin, Inc., PS, William R. Bishin, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.

Christopher K. Vick, Mark L. Lorbiecki, Renton, WA, Will Aitchison, Portland, OR, for Respondent.

Davis, Wright & Tremaine, P. Cameron De Vore, Bruce E. Johnson, Seattle, WA, Delwen Jones, Washington, DC,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API