Legal Opinion

Executive Development, Inc. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1990No. 88-658PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This appeal involves the question of whether the trial court erred in granting a defendant realtor's1 motion for summary judgment on a purchaser’s promissory fraud claim based on the purchaser’s allegation that the realtor had represented that rezoning of the property could be accomplished while knowing at the time he made the representation that the rezoning could not be accomplished.

I

First, we state the scope of review as set forth in Gulf City Body & Trailer Works, Inc. v. Phoenix Properties Trust, Inc., 531 So.2d 870, 872-73 (Ala.1988):

“The standard of review of a summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Bank of Red Bay v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Harrell v. DodsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. J. D. Pittman Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. UNITED COMPANIES LENDINGCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Cooper & Co., Inc. v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API