Deering v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of tbe district court for Nicollet county, Webber, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Action upon an order given for a harvester and binder. Defendant demurred to tbe complaint upon tbe ground that it did not state a cause of action. Tbe demurrer was sustained, from wbicb order plaintiffs appeal.
It appears from tbe complaint that on May 27, 1901, tbe parties entered into an agreement in writing in tbe form of an order for a harvester, bundle carrier, and binder cover, for which defendant was to turn over, on its delivery, an old Deering binder, and an approved note for $100, payable in November following. This order was addressed to plaintiffs’ agents, signed by tbe defendant,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American Manufacturing Co. v. KlarquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wasser v. Western Land Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Bennett v. DodgsonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Standard Lumber Co. v. Deer Park Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Veatch v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Kmetz v. . DerondeNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.