Legal Opinion

Eatman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1904PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Volusia county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of embezzlement in the Criminal Court of Record for Volusia county, and from the sentence imposed brings this writ of error.

The information charges “that M. W. Eatman, late of the county of Volusia, and State of Florida, on the 15th day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and three, in the county and State aforesaid, with force and arms, being then and there the agent and servant of the Doty & Stowe Company, a corporation doing business in the State of Florida, did then and there by virtue of his said employment as such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Thalheim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Sylvester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Strobhar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. McCall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Jarrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API