Legal Opinion

Henry H. Schott Co. v. Stone, Fisher & Lane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1904No. 4976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered July 10, 1903, dismissing the action, upon striking the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.

The appellant brought this action against the respondent to recover damages for a breach of contract. The lower court, on the motion of the respondent, struck out, as immaterial and irrelevant, the several allegations of the complaint relating to the damages alleged to have been suffered because of the breach, and dismissed the action on the refusal of the appellant to plead further. The case is here on the sufficiency of these allegations.

The contract, the breach of which is complained of, is set out in the complaint in the following language:

“That the plaintiff on or about the 10th day of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Victor Safe & Lock Co. v. O'NeilWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hess v. SeitzickWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hatchard v. Raymond Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API