Legal Opinion

Claim of Pavone v. Advance Auto Parts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 2010Published

1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 28, 2009, which ruled that claimant sustained a causally related occupational disease.

Claimant filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, alleging that he had sustained a back injury as a result of lifting and loading automobile parts and supplies while working as a delivery person for the employer. The employer’s workers’ compensation carrier disputed the claim and, following a hearing, a workers’ compensation law judge disallowed the claim. The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed that decision, and this appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Doersam v. Oswego County Dep't of Soc Servs.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Claim of Doersam v. Oswego County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Claim of Lincoln v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Claim of Pappas v. State University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API