Redmond v. Hayes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Fillmore county to determine adverse claims to certain real estate. The substance of the pleadings is given in the second paragraph of the opinion. From an order, Kingsley, J., granting, plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first amended answer as sham and frivolous, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal from an order of the district court of the county of Fillmore striking out the defendant’s first amended answer as sham and frivolous.
The action is one to determine adverse claims to real estate, consisting of eighty acres of farm land. The complaint was in the usual form in such actions, alleging the plaintiff’s ownership and possession of the land, without disclosing the source of the title, and that the defendant claimed some estate therein or lien thereon. The defendant by his original answer admitted that he claimed certain liens on the land, setting out the source and nature…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Horton v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Thysell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Sisco v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Aiken v. TimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Dondis v. LashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.