White Co. v. Quin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 304, Oct. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1918, No. 5020, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of The White Co. v. Edward C. Quin. Assumpsit for labor and materials. Eule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court discharged the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 304, Oct. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1918, No. 5020, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of The White Co. v. Edward C. Quin. Assumpsit for labor and materials. Eule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court discharged the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head, J.,
The plaintiff’s action is founded on a book account. It sues to recover a sum of money alleged to be due for materials furnished and work done in and about the rebuilding or repair of an automobile belonging to the defendant. A statement of claim was filed accompanied by a copy of the book entries which set forth in detail the different articles furnished and the price at which they were charged, together with the number of hours of labor expended in placing the same and the price per hour charged for such labor. The statement contained an averment that the prices or sums…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Husik v. LeverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928