Gusthal v. Strong
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the' defendants, John Jeroloman and another, from an -order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of November, 1897, granting the plaintiff’s motion ior a continuance pendente lite of a preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Rumsey, J.:
Tlie action is brought by a taxpayer to restrain the board of ■aldermen of the city of New York from granting a permanent franchise to the defendant railway company to extend its tracks upon certain streets and avenues of the city of New York. After ■a hearing at. the Special Term, a temporary injunction was granted restraining the board of aldermen and each of its members from voting-to pass a resolution, or any ordinance, granting or purporting to grant the consent of the common council of the city of New York for a period exceeding twenty-five years, with renewals not exceeding…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blanshard v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Riggs v. GardikasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- In re for the Removal of DeuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Blanshard v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Seltzer v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.