Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Auto Parts Co. v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 23, 1983No. 3-82 Civ. 1320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ALSOP, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This memorandum order sets forth the material facts about which the court finds there is no genuine issue, and the conclusions of law regarding defendants’ motion.
FACTS
Plaintiff Minneapolis Auto Parts Company, Inc. (hereinafter “MAPCO”) is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Plaintiffs Joseph and Nancy Garber, husband and wife, are citizens of the United States and residents of the State of Minnesota. They are controlling…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Littlefield v. City Of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Minneapolis Auto Parts Co. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Perkins v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Voettiner v. Commissioner of EducationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.