Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Hicks.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PetitioN for rehearing of this case, reported in 131 N. C., 90.

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, O. J.

This is a petition to rehear this case, reported in 131 N. C., 90. The grounds assigned in the petition are:

“1. That the Court overlooked the fact that the order of reference was compulsory and that the defendant excepted to the order of reference.” Neither ground is valid as a statements of fact. The opinion was largely based upon the fact that the order of reference was compulsory and the defendant, according to> the record, did not except to such order. The defendant merely excepted to the order of Judge Brown at a subsequent term amending the record to show that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Kerr v. Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Cecil v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Kerr v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API