Legal Opinion

Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. v. Depianti

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 2011No. A11A0342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doyle, Judge.

Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (“JPI”) brought this declaratory judgment action against Giovani Depianti and Hyun Ki Kim, seeking, in relevant part, a judgment that Depianti and Kim were not its employees under the Massachusetts Independent Contractor Statute (“MICS”)- 1 The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court found that issues of fact precluded summary judgment as to Kim, but the court granted summary judgment to Depianti. JPI now appeals the ruling as to Depianti, and for the reasons that follow, we reverse. 2

Summary judgment is proper…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Motorsport Engineering, Inc. v. Maserati SpaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Textile Rubber & Chemical Co. v. Thermo-Flex Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  4. Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API