Ramirez v. Chenier
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Peter Ramirez, a pedestrian, was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant Janette Chenier while attempting to cross the street at the intersection of Bagley and Twenty-Third in the city of Detroit. 'Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in refusing to give instructions to the jury to the effect that Detroit city ordinances § 38-12-1 and § 38-12-3 relieve a pedestrian of the duty to exercise ordinary car,e in the.crossing of a street at an intersection if he was not negligent in starting across and that a motor vehicle operator has an absolute duty to avoid such a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. John v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Knickerbocker v. SamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Howell v. HakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Greenberg v. GreenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fletcher v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974