Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Chenier

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1969No. Docket No. 4,259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Peter Ramirez, a pedestrian, was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant Janette Chenier while attempting to cross the street at the intersection of Bagley and Twenty-Third in the city of Detroit. 'Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in refusing to give instructions to the jury to the effect that Detroit city ordinances § 38-12-1 and § 38-12-3 relieve a pedestrian of the duty to exercise ordinary car,e in the.crossing of a street at an intersection if he was not negligent in starting across and that a motor vehicle operator has an absolute duty to avoid such a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. John v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Knickerbocker v. SamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Howell v. HakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Greenberg v. GreenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Fletcher v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API