Vlahos v. Sentry Insurance

Being in disagreement with the approach taken by the majority opinion in resolving the issue of entitlement to Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits, I must respectfully dissent for the reasons given by Presiding Judge McMurray in his dissent in Vlahos v. Sentry Ins. Co., 203 Ga. App. 540 (417 SE2d 180) (1992), and for the additional reasons contained herein.

We granted the writ of certiorari in this case to determine whether an employee who is continuously employed before disability and accrues income rather than receiving it is entitled to benefits for loss of income or earnings under…