Legal Opinion

Claim of Weinstein v. Apex Dress Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs and the claim before the Workmen’s Compensation Board dismissed. The Workmen’s Compensation Board found that “ the prolonged argument and emotional strain participated in by the decedent prior to his collapse on July 24, 1964 involved greater stress and exertion than the ordinary wear and tear of life.” On this record such finding is incorrect, as a matter of law. The altercation did not involve stresses or strains greater than ordinary wear and tear of life (Matter of Zygler v. Tenzer Coat Co., 19 A D 2d 660,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Santacroce v. 40 W. 20th Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Sloman v. Roger Detective BureauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API