Legal Opinion

William Robert Dare Gary Petillo v. State of California Dept. Of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1999No. 97-56065Published

1Opinion of the Court

191 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 1999)

WILLIAM ROBERT DARE; GARY PETILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 97-56065

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted April 15, 1999--Pasadena, California

Decided September 16, 1999

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Angela Sierra, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Andrew R. Hall, Elizabeth Staggs-Wilson, Davis, Wright & Tremaine, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiffs appellees.

Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API