Legal Opinion

City of Venice v. Valente

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 25, 1983No. 81-2432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

429 So.2d 1241 (1983)

CITY OF VENICE, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant,

v.

Matilde VALENTE, Appellee.

No. 81-2432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 25, 1983.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1983.

Wayne C. Hall of Dickinson, O'Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Venice, for appellant.

Charles J. Cheves of Cheves & Rapkin, Venice, for appellee.

OTT, Chief Judge.

Ordinance 789-79[1] of the appellant/City of Venice provides for the abatement of any building found to be a public nuisance. The subject of dispute here is that provision of the ordinance allowing the city to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Miami Beach v. Rocio Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. City of SunriseSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Gulf View Apartments, Inc. v. City of VeniceSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Ormond Beach v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Metropolitan Dade County v. SantosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1985
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1984
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API