Legal Opinion
Town of Rutland v. City of Rutland
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 22, 1999No. 97-430PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Defendants East Mountain Company and John A. Russell Corporation appeal the superior court’s ruling that a water line under Gleason Road in the Town of Rutland is the property of the Town. John A. Russell Corp. (Russell) was the general contractor for a development owned by East Mountain Company and installed the water line at issue. After a dispute with the Town over whether it would compensate Russell/East Mountain for the line, East Mountain agreed to sell the water line to the City of Rutland. The trial court declared the line belonged to the Town. We affirm.
In 1985, Congregational House,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toys, Inc. v. F.M. Burlington Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Properties, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- New England Educational Training Service, Inc. v. Silver Street PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Reynolds v. SullivanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stephan Palmer, Sr. v. Mark Furlan and State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Quenneville v. ButtolphSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Kellogg v. ShusherebaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Donald L. Sweet, Jr. and Preston L. Sweet v. Roy A. St. Pierre and Catherine St. Pierre d/b/a Woodlands FarmsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Camara v. CamaraSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.