Legal Opinion
Puricelli v. Republic of Argentina
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 10, 2015No. Nos. 14-2104-cv(L), 14-2105-cv(CON), 14-2106-cv(CON), 14-2107-cv(CON), 14-2108-cv(CON), 14-2109-cv(CON), 14-2111-cv(CON), 14-2112-cv(CON)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRAUB, Circuit Judge:
After previous panels of this Court twice vacated aggregate judgments entered by the District Court in favor of plaintiff classes, we remanded with specific instructions. Rather than follow our instructions, the District Court certified expanded plaintiff classes. Because doing so was foreclosed by the mandate issued on the prior appeal, we VACATE and REMAND.
BACKGROUND
In 2001, the Republic of Argentina defaulted on roughly $80 to $100 billion of sovereign debt. Seijas v. Republic of Argentina, 606 F.3d 53, 55 (2d Cir.2010) [hereinafter Seijas /]. Numerous actions by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Luiz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brecher v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Brown v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Kotler v. JubertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Statek Corp. v. Development Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. AquartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.