Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rubano v. DiCenzo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 25, 2000No. 97-604-APublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBourcier, Justice

In this proceeding, three questions of law deemed by the Chief Judge of the Family Court to be of such doubt and importance as to affect the merits of a pending complaint in that Court have been certified to this Court pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 9-24-27. The plaintiff in that pending complaint is Maureen V. Rubano (Rubano), and the defendant therein is her former same-sex, live-in partner, Concetta A DiCenzo (DiCenzo). In her complaint Rubano seeks to establish a de facto maternal relationship status with the biological and minor child of DiCenzo. I concur in part, and dissent in part with the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API