Legal Opinion

Tatoma, Inc. v. Newsom

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 8, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00098Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 TATOMA, INC., a California Case No.: 3:21-cv-098-BEN-JLB Corporation, DBA Atelier Aucoin Salon 14 et al., ORDER Granting Defendants’ 15 Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs, 16 v. [ECF Nos. 16, 31, 34] 17 GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official 18 capacity as Governor of California, et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 “[B]inding authority is very powerful medicine.” Hart v. Massanari,

266 F.3d 22

1155, 1171 (9th Cir. 2001). While it was not the case when the Complaint was filed, 23 there is now binding authority that Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API