Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Torbert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lee. Heard before the Hon. N. S. Graham.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The bill in this case is filed by the appellant, to set aside and cancel a mortgage executed by her and her husband, A. F. Rogers, on certain lands owned by her, given to secure a promissory note payable to one of the appellees, E. A. Torbert, which had been executed by them jointly, as co-makers with one John C. W. Rogers, for whom they were sureties. The land is claimed by the wife to be her separate statutory estate. The defendant and mortgagee, E. A. Torbert, makes an answer, which is prayed to be taken in the nature of a cross-bill against complainant, and by which he seeks a foreclosure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thames & Co. v. Rembert's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Merritt v. PhenixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
  3. Hooks v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shakespeare v. AlbaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API