Duncan v. Duncan
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The question which we propose first to consider, is, whether the proof of a codicil written upon the same paper, and referring to the will, when proved, is a sufficient authentication, to give effect to such portions of a will as are not revoked by the codicil. In the case of Haven v. Foster, 14 Pick. 534, it is held that the proof of such a codicil establishes the will, and the court say that “ Whatever may have been the difference of opinion amongst eminent judges, in regard to the correctness of the rule in question, we consider it well settled upon satisfactory authorities, commencing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brownell v. De WolfU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1824
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buerger v. BuergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Loeber v. LeiningerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Hubbard v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- People ex rel. Storey v. KnickerbockerIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Gary v. CarsonBaltimore City Circuit Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.